Talk:Angel/@comment-213.119.32.191-20150103132401/@comment-213.119.32.191-20150106223803

And since you seem to have the wrong idea about me ("because we seem to return to square one every time you start new discussion."), I'd like to make it clear that I am not asking "how" or "why" there are inconsistencies. And certainly not the same question over and over. It's been made very clear to me now what causes the inconsistencies and I understand and remember them. But that doesn't remove the fact that there still are some inconsistencies. And that's the things I keep asking, which are the most correct ones? I know you people don't always know yourself, and I don't expect that from you. Most of my question are just rhetorical questions. If someone actually finds a decent answer, that's fine, then we are all enlightened. But I'm not expecting all of you to constantly clear up any confusion from me.

My "question" here was not why the angel article is different, it's how to interpret it so that it does not conflict with the rest. It was not directed towards you and neither did I expect anyone to answer. I was just thinking out loud.

If any of my words gave you the wrong impression, then I'm sorry. I didn't mean to cause conflict by being unclear about my intentions.