Talk:Demon/@comment-25035274-20150827130304/@comment-25035274-20150827162207

The argument you're talking about ultimately wasn't really about her clothes being specifically a wedding ring. It was about the fact that someone (ANYone) making something just for you is not really an act of selfishness, which is what the other person in the argument was asserting (his claim being that it was selfish for her to not make clothes for other men). Honestly, I understood his sentiment (his concerns over any inherent selfishness that mamono may present, which we all know is present to some extent or other in just about every mamono). I just didn't agree with his specific choice of examples.

Back to the original point of 'this' discussion, based on what KC has actively stated in the profile, she winds up not being a very good slave-master at all, seeing as she's pretty much held to damn near the same terms. He has to give her sex whenever she wants it; she has to give him sex whenever he wants it.

As such, I still really don't see it as much more than a marriage contract.