Talk:Mist Continent/@comment-25930818-20150918145856

> Difference being that Twitter posts are blatantly visible and can easily be double-, triple-, or quadruple-checked if anyone cares to take the time to do so.

It's not the verifyability that concerns me, it's the informality. I guess I think of it in the same way that I think about Barak Obama's twitter account. Yeah, he's President, but a tweet from that account does not constitute a presidential executive order nor does it articulate official US policy. Because it's Twitter, not specially headed notepaper from the Office of the President of the United States. Twitter is a platform for trolling n00bs and following the latest AVs of your favourite Japanese porn stars, not for solemn declarations of official policy.

So basically my argument is "I don't like Twitter so it doesn't count". Which is not that convincing, but when your argument is "There's no such thing as obiter dictum", I would at least beseech you to consider the possibility that you may be mistaken.

Also The baphomet is said to have the most amazing vagina of all the monsters was Wandering Scholar in print MGE1, and it is in the article. Literally "Baphomet is best girl" was a tweet by KC.