Thread:The Reptile King/@comment-38531539-20190918085948/@comment-28144855-20190924134820

In universe/work/setting, he observes, judges and arbiters the state of the said verse. However, much like I don't read minds to tell what you meant by ridiculous, in all fairness, you do not as well. If you recall, I tell how he never decided an outcome of any RP, several times actually. And only acted when directly antagonized. He's supposed to be fair and unbiased, despite his relations. Something I can't show if he doesn't have exposition. He vanished without a trace by the end of my novel, thuss Enki, Son of Anu the Watcher Arael's 2nd in command, a Loki/Q type of character did mischief, hence many of Andrejs were 'displaced' trough multiverses. Why Arael disappered is the whole quest, something far more than power. Some of our group characters are arguably more OP since they know it all, are liked by all, can do no wrong. You all cling to OP as mere power, I do not, hence our misunderstandings.

His quest is finding again his inner balance, as an Arbiter without balance is a bad Arbiter. His disbalance stems from his past (I do not wish to spoil) And as I stated, he never decided Jack shit, but if antagonized, he retaliated so far so good. He was sealed and sent in the mortal world to learn for himself what disbalance and any non neutral and random chaos brings. He is learning from scratch, even now as he's unsealed. Since even having vast knowledge, it is its usage that determines the end result, not the knowledge itself.

There's more to a story than mere power, you see, something many deny, some to hide their other type of OP 'while compelled to expose mine or that of other people's characters. But, without exposition, I can't show that happening, now, can I? So in the end, without me having the chance to show that it ends lost to the people who then assume he must be OP for the sake of OP, despite lacking the entirety of the context behind the conflict of the story. Of course, this setting's rule making it a bit sillier, but even with silly, there can be balance.

I hope it is understandable enough.

Edit: Of course there's the Language used issue. In my native, I'm pretty well versed with all sorts of narrations, expositions, embelishments, synonims and differentiating characters trough speech, in English, I'm rather poor so it is a fact my work in English are leagues below and It shows, needless to say its frustrating to the point it affects my creativity and even the will to go trough with it all, imagine now all sorts of bashing and belittling of my work I get despite people doesn't even have the grasp of how things actually are in it.