Talk:Houri/@comment-31401828-20170321175538/@comment-26036704-20170401000559

To make this a bit easier i'm just gonna quote what i'm specifically replying to

" 1. I don't understand what you're saying. Please word it better."

I don't   Think  she look's like a loli at all

" 2. No, it does not. It can still be a loli. She does have qualities of one. She doesn't look like a loli to me but from the way, she's designed it seems as if she's intended to be one. The stature, breast size, curves etc."

if she was intended to be one they would have described her apperence as "childish"

Or said she "looks like a little girl"

Hence why i do not think she was intended to be one

However We couldn't know what KC intended Unless we ask him

And i don't know how to speak or write japanese Hell i can bearly write in english.

" 3. I don't get this either. What is the point you're trying to argue?"

My argument is There are super few Oppai loli's

only one is an oppai loli when they get hit by a spell

and the other Specifically says she's an Oppai loli (or well She look's like a child but has a huge rack)

there is nothing mentioning that

and i feel like if she were an Oppai Loli she it would have been mentioned

Also the fact that

IF they were angel's of love

Why would they take a form or have a form Given to them by the goddess of love that Quite a a lot men would not find attracitve/love (Ie that of a child)