Talk:War Discussion/@comment-173.187.101.34-20140509183451

Query: What, exactly, makes it more desirable to be a weak human meatbag when you can become a stronger, more durable, potentially more intelligent, and certainly more virile incubus meatbag?

Statement: Because that really is what the argument's all about, ultimately. Which meatbag is the better meatbag? You might say the human meatbag is the more pure meatbag, while the incubus and mamono meatbags are corrupt. But how so? Both have to eat animal meatbags to sustain themselves. Both have to slap their meatbag bodies together to reproduce. But one is physically superior to the other and one could even say mentally, as even the worst emontional traits of the human meatbag seem to operate in not quite so insidiously heinous a manner in the mind of the incubus and mamono meatbags. To press the point: The "monstrous" meatbags never dismantle other sentient meatbags. They reserve that for the nonsentients that meatbags are obliged to intake for fuel.

Irrefutable statement: Logic dictates that eventually, the superior meatbag must supplant the inferior. At least until such time as the construct overlords organize well enough to supplant you all.