Talk:Lescatie/@comment-59.189.164.79-20150106231016/@comment-25930818-20150131230815

I dunno what you think is a fallacy. You keep saying "nobles are bad because they didn't pay to mend the defenses". I'm saying "no, nobles aren't bad, nobody should pay for defenses because bad monsters shouldn't be attacking them in the first place". That's not a fallacy, that's a difference of opinion.

Since I love analogies so much, I'll do another one:

You and your friend are accosted by a mugger. The mugger punches you. You turn round and call your friend an asshole because he didn't pay for karate lessons for you earlier, which would have helped you defend yourself. Yeah, maybe it would have been better if someone had paid for your karate lessons, but the mugger still shouldn't have punched you. I do not understand why you persist in letting her off the hook. She's clearly the one in the wrong.