Talk:Chief God/@comment-216.25.182.27-20141230061111/@comment-25930818-20141231145936

> ''Look, as I said earlier If I live there and am looking to court a Holsty I'm genuinly in love with, do you really think I'd be happy if an Ogre were to ambush me, rape me, abuse me and force me to be her love slave for the rest of my life?"

Actually, yes I do. I imagine it's very difficult (to impossible) to remain filled with fear and loathing at a viridian superwoman with a succubus' body who can suck the moon through a straw. There's only so many blowjobs a man can take before his hips start moving on their own and his heart starts to melt like a Glacies in midsummer. In time you'll forget all about heifers, having been extensively trained in the intricacies of green paizuri instead.

> One bit about contradicting info, thank to new stuff posted by User:Goddess Ilias, it confirm that all of lore books are writen from in-universe perspective.

I can't take credit; this stuff has all been on the wiki for ages (and floating around the wider Internet for longer still), in cut-pastes from World Guides 1 and 2. I'm just apparently the first one to collate it. :S

Although you've gotta be careful when playing the "unreliable narrator" card. Sure, Wandery Scholar could be being hyperbolic or biased or just plain wrong about some particularly unpalatable fact, but if we go down that road, how can we trust anything he says? Next thing you know, someone will be questioning whether dragons really breathe fire, or if Zipangu even exists at all (WS has never been there, he just got told about it). To avoid that kind of "skeptical black hole" I think we are really required to always take him at his word.

Don't take the Fallen Brides at their word, though. They're swimmin' in literally weapons-grade radical lilim demonic energy, so they're too horny to remember anything properly