Talk:War Discussion/@comment-24849899-20140512032648/@comment-24849899-20140515193008

Okay okay, I only said we kill IF they get in our way, lets take a couple with a man that lives a life with his mamono wife(That rhymes). If they see us marching down the pathway and the couple gets in our way, hindering progress, they will be killed.

If they don't, we leave them alone if they do the same. They can freely do whatever they want behind closed doors.

Now lets say a certain town or village sends their mamono and/or human soldiers to hinder our progress, we'll call it Opleton for now. So lets say we kicked the armies ass to tommorow, we then will identify who sent them by either forced questioning, or some sort of clue off the dead body. We will then assume that they are planning to try and take out the human armies. We however won't send our soldiers dressed as civies immediately, we send them a warning letter to back off, and if they refuse, that's when we send in our disguised soldiers.

Now we enter the village and find that some humans are held against their will, we have to first identify who is which, it may take hours or days, but we then get done scouting the area, we find a building of importance, and bomb the living hell out of it. Their soldiers will then investigate and that's when we strike, when they are exposing their weakest opening. Guerilla warfare at it's finest.

We then liberate the city and reclaim what was lost.

But we only kill if they get in our way, that seems to be the most misconceptionary thing in this whole debate.