Thread:Mnzombie/@comment-24598219-20140320053749/@comment-24.121.180.26-20140321193610

81.241.134.205 wrote: Look, pal, Kenkou Cross has every right to use artistic license in his own work. Every artist does. If he wants his Succubi to be like that, that's his choice and right. Hell, he can even take an angelic being and call that a Succubus if he wants to. You should also consider that in real mythologies, the definition of such beings isn't set in stone, so you can't really say what the exact correct definition of a Succubus is. If you have a problem with that, fine. But don't expect other people to conform to your opinion. So would you stop complaining here? This wiki deals exclusively with Kenkou Cross' work. It doesn't focus on real life mythological beings.

And et al .. ad nauseum ... Look folks, if Mr. Cross wants to host his own server, and do his own thing; or if Mnzombie wants to do that as well; I would have had no objection. Anyone can be a thief or a vandal, when the value of the information is local to that library.

You all forget the environment you are operating IN. This is a Wiki, as such the members, contributors and hosts are obligated to give some license to the notion of informational integrity. Authors' License has absolutely no place here, unless that person(s) are the absolute source for that information.

Mnzombie, has every right to place disambiguation into the MGE, in an effort to uphold that absolute requirement of a Wiki. An ordinary encyclopedia has peers who are the actual gatekeepers for truth and accuracy. A wiki is open to be contributed to, from anywhere and anyone. No one can stop you from being informational hoodlums if you want to, but I and many others (including Mnzombie) are the kinds of people that do not believe in lawless wanton destruction of information.

Nobody cares about the accuracy of a artificial world (like Mr. Cross'), least of all me. The denizens of these worlds have no peer review when they are truly new. However, there are times when he and others might intrude on already developed information, well peer reviewed. And that is what this discussion is about.

This discussion is an experience in muturation. You all can be adults, who know what the value of Informational Truth is. Or you can vandalize the entire database of the Planet, corrupting our knowledge until there is no audit trail on anything ever again. There is no middle ground.

Fact and Truth, or fiction and anarchy. The choice, is yours.