Talk:Original Chief God/@comment-25035274-20150113155836

Just because it's short doesn't mean it isn't a valid article. It brings to prominence an important, yet often overlooked point that many people aren't aware of. Namely, that there have been multiple "Chief God"s.

The purpose of a wiki isn't just to archive images; it's to consolidate information and make it easier to find. Quite honestly, as long as its properly cited there's really no harm.

It would be a different matter if this were fan-fic or fanon, of course. In that case, it would need to be moved to a blog post. However, it isn't fan-fic. It isn't even speculation. It's concrete information supported with proper documentation.

It does not prevent the addition of an official page on the Original Chief God if KC decides to release more information at a later date. In fact, as we've seen on many of the profile articles, it would be a simple matter to incorporate an official profile into this page, or just rewrite this page from the ground up as needed.

So... What's the beef, d00dz?