Talk:Unicorn/@comment-26017717-20150419133827/@comment-27069434-20151014081413

Well, as the song goes, "Who am i to disagree" with KC, but equines having another...um, womanhood aside from marehood does feel somewhat disturbing, as in "equines not supposed to have an opening there" disturbing. Equine skeletal and internal structures have no predisposition towards incorporating any additional openings in the front section due to it corresponding roughly to human's shoulders and chest.

As to the arachnid and some other similar species such as cancer, worker ant and e.t.c., it probably appears more natural to have a womanhood as per normal homo sapiens female body due to the animalistic part usually having a natural openng there, too. Except that in animals it is usually a mouth. You see, the point of connection for both bodies is made up where the human pelvic bone ends and lower extremities begin with pubic bones being conjoined with the frontal projection of thorax of the arachnid or crustacean. Basically the same principle is valid for ants, warrior-beetle mamono and others of similar built. For a better view, see Girtablilu profile image clearly showing the human(oid) buttocks and compare the cancer profile image with a photograph of a real crostacean in frontal rojection to see the similarities in the way openings are located.

On a side note, arachnid&Co having a "merged" human(oid) womanhood with animalistic mouth...how should an intercourse via that particular openng be classified? Personally I assume the openng to be considered a womanhood, because, as far as i know, it serves the reproductive purpose (more or less, because I haven't seen any bit of info stating a mamono is capable of ingesting food - semen|spirit energy excluded - through that organ).