Talk:Human/@comment-28144855-20200111174938/@comment-27950421-20200112043545

First off, I was referring to within a fictional setting, not real world. I do not like talking about religion woth people on the internet that I like. Given how atheists are still rarity these days it and relgious folks often get their panties in a wad when someone who doesn't also belive makes their presence known, but since you've brought it up, I may as well put it down.

In real world physics, we presently have no method of finding out anything further in the past than the Big Bang. We also have no method to determine whether the Big Bang is the beginning of the universe or simply it shifting from a different configuration into the current. There for we do not know and cannot find out at our current level of technology and scientific understanding.

And Aro... pulling a God of the Gaps fallacy on me shows one of two things. Either your epistemology is garbage, or you are being extremely dishonest here. It's an insult to my intelligence that you would think I would actually fall for such half-assed reasoning, especially when said reasoning advocating for an entity that logically impossible. Don't waste my time with it again.

Now with that out of the way, a character with true omnipotence is a boring character. There is no tension or intrigue in a story with such a character because the result is obvious. The guy with unlimited power is gonna get his way. I mean, Superman had that problem before The Death of Superman was put out and he isn't even omnipotent.

Generally you can make a character more powerful scaling with how distant they are with the protagonist, but when a character has true omnipotence even that won't help. Sorry, but any fictional setting I run will not have a single all powerful sky daddy running the place. It renders what anyother character does meaningless. In your setting Arael doesn't matter.