Thread:ExiledAce666/@comment-28144855-20171201043409/@comment-33719112-20171201230141

Well I don't know anything about whatever mortal ascension you're proposing, because you didn't explain that. Is this based off MGE? Secondly, one person was close to becoming a god, and then they stopped because they wanted to save somebody. Alright, cool. Slowly learning.

Yep, you can't learn while you're dead. And yes, that isn't always your choice, because everybody dies, there's always somebody that can kill you, and at some point, that somebody will, whether you like it or not. And yes, winners do write history, and the rules, and the defined borders. You know who did that, and did that well? Hitler. Boom. He took Poland. He said "This is also Germany now." You can see my point here, I don't want to go into "He killed the Jews" or "Hitler was a pyschopath", but there is always a defined evil. Hitler, was evil. Sure, he restabilized the German government, but he also killed six million people.

And yes, what happens after you win is what makes you evil or not, but good and evil are able to be measured. Good does things that benefit others. Evil does not. Sure, winning, right? It's the best. But winning corrupts some. You don't learn from winning all the time. The second you get knocked on your bum, you learn why. If you just win, there's no reason as to why, besides from the 'I'm better.' factor. For example, a TV show. Dragonball. Right? Dragonball is cool, and whenever a new enemy is introduced, the new enemy defeats the main character. A few million episodes after, Goku says, "Oh! So that's why I was beaten, because Cell was doing this!" Then said enemy evolves/tells them that they have planned for this/combusts and that's a whole different story.

I do have a question however, if Arael was sealed inside a human child that developed into Aro, why/how is Arael still around? That would be a progression of character, lest I don't catch something again.