Thread:Jekkers/@comment-12776-20150920091627/@comment-12776-20150921164523

Actually, the problem isn't that he ignore it for "completely change a bit of established canon", it's how he totally refuse to accept it (even when other used it as citation).

Now, I think I annoy Jekkers abit now, but please bare with me.

As I said, I actually forgot the link to second thread (which I claimed he use outright lie in arguement) because I were too haste (still ultra-busy, but have some time to think clearly while compose this message), it's here. As you can see in last paragraph, he claimed only books are canon (which is contradicted with Kenkou's words in his message) and refuse to accept Q&A.

Now, if it's just his own headcanon I won't bother, but he also used the arguement to ignore other in discussion as well, and I do post Kenkou's message to point out that it isn't the case for few times already, but it look like he either ignore it or pretent to never see it.

So, would you give him a reminder that even if he doesn't accept it, people have right to backup their statement with Q&A, and Kenkou himself also state that books isn't only canon?

(really, I say he's utter aggressive and lack of respect to other, but that's isn't what my purpose of to start this thread)