Talk:Incubus/@comment-25075355-20150913135236/@comment-26419174-20150920212534

@Kuruni.I am familiar with that particular issue of translation, and i got to say that I do not find that particular argument convincing. the best wat explain why is by using the technique called "Rationalist's taboo"

Here  http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Rationalist_taboo is the detailed definition but the short version is thus: the parties in a discussion temporarily ban usage of certain words and use  more detailed and presice definitions instead. The words I am calling to prohibit are "rape" and "violation".

As such, let's start by stating that I find  to be atrosious and horible any sexiual act in which informed consent  was not exchanged by the parties. Now ,if we were to look at the way the banned words are used in the profiles, then we can see that quite commonly, almost always in fact, the above given definition describes those actions perfectly. As such I do not care which of the two banned words you do use becauce their meaning is presicely the same in context.

@ A wikia: First of allI would like to extend to you my request to ban usage of the words "rape" and "violation"throughout this discussion. You can se the full reasoning in the @Kuruni section.

Secondly with regards to  the usage of raging mushroom, I would like say that from my point of view sex initiated under effects of one do not costitute a sexiual act in which informed consent  was not exchanged by the parties. The reason for that is contained in the fact that any MG unvilling to consent to sex unaffected by the shroom due to metaphysical rules of the setting. Therefore her being affected by the shoom is in my opinion sufficient to claim consent. Important note: not applicable to real world due to the absence of nessecary metaphisical rules.

Tihrdly, I would like to state, that I find your post to be highly hypocritical and full of double standart. Now this might  sound offensive and I do apologise if it did. Nevertheless, you did write quite a paragraph on one of the very few cases where male is the one to initiate(what you consider to be ) a sexiual act in which informed consent  was not exchanged by the parties, yet you have completly ingored another much more common in this work scenario, where the female is the initiator.