Talk:Druella/@comment-27595114-20150729023448/@comment-12776-20150807030355

"[...]however myself (and presumable quite a few people who think in roughly the same way) cannot just blindly believe in something with little to no evidence, as a result we have doubts,[...]"

Lets get it straight for once, what kind of evidence you want to prove the non-existence? The official word is negative of fact ("it is not brainwhaing"), what kind of existence uyou need to prove the non-existence? I say if you want to prove that it's brainwashing, you're one who have to find evidence that it is brainwashing.

It's kind of like I say "there's no cheese on moon" and you ask for evidence that there's really no cheese on moon. I may give you hundred text books about how we never find cheese on moon, yet you can still argue how none of that exactly prove that there's no cheese on moon. Then use the same case to argue that the statement is not proven, we end up with a circular argument.

This is especially true since we're talking about Kenkou's fantasy work, not real life or work that claimed to be based on real life. So lack of evidence that it's brainwashing is good enough to prove that it isn't brainwashing.

I don't know you realize the irony here, but currently you (and presumable quite a few people who think in roughly the same way) are blindly dismiss his words with little to no evidence.

"Can a monster/ incubus have issues with/ objections to DL plan which cannot be boiled down to "she is not rad enough?'"

Sure, totally. I just don't think that thought will motivate them enough to do much, because the other side is far worse to them.