Talk:War Discussion/@comment-23603505-20140513024215

Um ok, I was holding a debate with Father on his recent comment chain, It was confusing because of the religious comment chain. So I kinda drew the focus back to the beginning.

But I was pointing out how he plans to retake lost territory, while the swiss and Spartans of old would be proud of his tatics, a modern histortain would be sweeping because the main point is to finish the campain with as little losses as possible.

General Custerd of the Union army, he and his men where killed because he underestimated the Native Americans, (much like how some pro Order supports underestimate mamonos) and paid for his lack of foresight.

Father is falling into the same mistakes that Nepoleon fell into tatical wise and orginazion wise. You say you will have troops for every possible occassion that could and would ever arise. The French Empeor had Light Caliver, Heavy Cailvoiry, gunners, spearmen, foeigin legions, sea corp spy corp, Dragoons (elite calveliers) All of them had diffrent uniforms and were well orginazed but it was hard to tell who was in charge.

How you paint your Grand Army is you want to have all the power you want to have the final say on everything. Hitler had that command structure and it fell apart on Stalingard and D-day, your no retreat style will lead your army to oblivion. This isn't Naruto, Bleach or One Peice that force of willpower isn't going to get you very far in a fight with an Ememy who could just by looking at you can break command order.

Now I'm sorry but that's not possible unless you know your enemy like the back of your hand.