Talk:Incubus/@comment-25075355-20150913135236/@comment-25930818-20150918232107

> And here is another from Lesser Succubus article, which you sneak in your opinion but pretend to just revert vandalism.

As in the spirit energy example, that was a perfectly good analogy which assists understanding of the phenomenon, it doesn't confuse it. Put it back in please. Also, I hardly think you have any right to accuse me of inserting opinion into articles when you don't just change the article, you change THE ACTUAL ENCYCLOPEDIA TRANSLATION to fit your own interpretation.

''> No. In that case, it's your opinion against three sources of info - not your opinion against my opinion. I have actual information why you're wrong in that discussion, you provide none except your own interpretion of that story. So I do have right to say you're wrong there.''

I was going to say that this is a rather shameless example of you claiming "It's a-OK when I do it, but it's super-bad when you do it". Something Ilias thinks that Kuruni disagrees with? Ilias is pushing his opinion as fact, what a troll! Something Kuruni thinks that Ilias disagrees with? No this is real fact!

But then as A Wikia points out below, you are actually, literally wrong about the NTR thing and he has the source to prove it, so...

> Here is preface from Fallen Maidens with note at the bottom how it's derivative work (二次創作 - 二次 secondary 創作 work) and the official stories are still ones in Fallen Maidens.

Type "derivative work" into Google, you know what the first result is?

Derivative work ''A derivative work is a work based on or derived from one or more already existing works. Common derivative works include translations, musical arrangements, motion picture versions of literary material or plays, art reproductions, abridgments, and condensations of preexisting works.''

So the fact that we're using the English translation means we're already scrambling around in this particular barrel. And just for the sake of the simultaneous discussion I'm having with Party:  It's pretty clear that just because Kenkou draw it doesn't mean it's official. So, by corollary, it's pretty clear that just because Kenkou says it doesn't mean it's official. Bye-bye, "Twitter and Q&As are canon".

> Yeah, but you failed to mention that they're available to all believers and not just those who die serving the will of the Prophet

Oh, well, I'm sorry I didn't reproduce the entire hadith from the Qu'ran with all the exceptions and inclusions. If you're gonna start pillorying people for not enumerating every possible relevant subsidiary fact with everything they say, we're all gonna be here for some time.

> It's just that you refuse to accept it no matter what and that make it worse.

I accepted I was wrong about the Chaos Gods, because there I actually was wrong. I didn't accept that I was wrong with all your examples, because there I wasn't wrong.