Talk:Cockatrice/@comment-26570826-20150704015226/@comment-12776-20150718040022

@Altom41: I know, I'm still looking for official in-universe statement too. Too bad that now much of books info are dumped into few pages instead of nicely organized as they used to be, and just look at all text make me feel lazy.

For now, I combine the all happy ending meta rule with how the Wanderer can be hyperbole or generalize mamono's behavior too much to give room when I come across something sound too bad.

Now, for Cockatrice chicken. Actually there's a room to insert meta rule without contradict the narartion, simple one too.

Although the profile said she would paralyze him when the pheromones wear off, it doesn't state that she will indefinite keep him. She may release him (or in this case, maybe just get off him and walk away, shoulders down) after few rounds if she find him doesn't enjoy her at all. the part that say she would keep him there until he's broken. come from Pyrro's comment, of which, for whatever reason, quoted by Bruce(24.202.19.242) as if it's official statement.

It doesn't help here that both Pyrro and Bruce(24.202.19.242) define scenario as typical mind break, which is actually going against the narration here. "As if to suggest they want him to thrust it in and violate them more..." I think anyone with common sense would be aware that it's impossible to break someone's will and still has him violate her. Now, if "break" mean (after few rounds of orgasm) he realize that he actually enjoy it and start forcefully bang her small body on his own accord, then it does make sense. But in that case, surely his eyes would be blazing with passion instead of empty.