Thread:Jekkers/@comment-12776-20150819054521/@comment-24169511-20150821134443

We'll fall back on what we've always done (Or at least what I've always enforced since day one): If it doesn't get the green light from MGR, our only reputable source of English translations, then it doesn't make it onto the main text space. You're more than welcome to argue about what belongs where and whether or not we should include an assumed piece, but above everything else, the article text needs to remain as accurate as possible. Since neither of you are fluent in Japanese > English, the changes you conclude are educated guesses at best and unreliable information like that is the exact opposite of what belongs on a Wiki.

There is a ton of ambiguity left in the translations we receive but as we know, that's completely intentional. It's the reader's job to digest the material "as is" and come up with their own conclusion. If we start allowing people to contribute edits based on what they can surmise from their limited knowledge, then we've failed to uphold the author's original intentions.

I haven't actually been following the entire argument (Read the most recent posts) but I hope that the above covered your points of concern. If it doesn't get back to me and I'll clarify further since I don't want to leave anyone confused.