Board Thread:What Would You Do?/@comment-34263048-20181207162014/@comment-36855838-20181209040043

MockingJester wrote: Ok, gotta make it clear. Not against dominant women in the least. The hellhounds: she dites the one she chose with care and nurture. Basically a bulwark.

The demon, same thing. Heck, it says she’ll cook whatever he want should he ask. The contract swings both way in a sense.

The amazon? She doesn’t seem to have something that tells me she cares for the poor guy. Just that they’re inferior and gets stuck to kitchen duty because cooking is apparently a detriment. Then, they get dragged in the middle of the road and pegged by everyone just to it can tickle her Willy for a second or two. Nothing telling they’d consider a proof of genuine love between the two. Nothing telling they’d hold their man special enough to outright trust they with what they eat. Nothing...just what looks to be some man-hating society.

This is the sorta thing KK falls into, with the unfortunate vagueness.

He describes how it's restrictive, and lists things which are done, but either he actually did it this way, or there was a connotation lost in translation.

The result is a lack of an emotional context for what they do, and so we are left to judge them by their actions alone, and the emotional context which we assign to those actions.