Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31931593-20170506073140/@comment-30014014-20170506151200

Actually I am for neither of them. I despise the two opposite spectrums.

The spectrum of light claims to be doing all of this for humanity, thinking to be their defender, but through stories I've read about the way they function, it's fairly easier to say it depends on how valuable a village/city is. They're not going to go out of their ways to go rescue a city that has no material value to offer them. It's like a paid service to be saved. And, as that Lescatie place thaught me, even those under their protection get abused and taxed to oblivion as 'necessary ressources'. The high ranking of their order are easily corrupted, more prone to use lower ranking families and individuals and claim they should be honored.

The spectrum of darkness claim to want an end to bloodshed via a tuning of their creatures as women seeking men to love. But, as we can all see, they're pretty aggressive when it some to that, to the point where most can call it forced. No matter what you think, no matter the people you already have, if she takes a fancy to you, your only only is to either escape or be kidnapped away from your family. Some would say DE would portrait their feeling to their victims, but Stockholm syndrome can do that as well. Plus, we have to deal with the extremists around here that just want to paint the world in their point of view, spreading their DE like a plague. If you think about it, the spectrum of darkness is merely a changed method of massive extinction.

So yea, they both suck, leaving out those stranded as collateral damage.