Talk:Cu Sith/@comment-84.27.198.110-20151017000502/@comment-205.243.115.254-20151019173943

It's the definition used by just about everyone that uses the term. If it's an animal with human attributes, it's furry. There aren't 'levels' of furry-ness; it's a binary label. Either it has humanoid features (meaning it's furry) or it doesn't have humanoid features (meaning it isn't furry).

Like Party said, it seems like you're trying to exclude yourself from being a furry by imposing a distinction that simply isn't there.