Talk:Alp/@comment-25041612-20141009072715/@comment-25035274-20150217162040

Actually, I discount it because it is evidently one study, fifteen years ago, conducted by someone who thought they new better than the world what the world collectively wanted to bang.

Let's look at the slider one last time, because you said something in a post elsewhere on this wiki that's worth considering. Specifically, you said something about there being a point where-in, if you push the slider past a certain threshold (and I believe it was, in specific, in regard to animals; horses and goats, if I recall correctly), it moves out of aesthetic appreciation and into I-Want-To-Hit-That-Shit-ville.

My point? If said slider has a point where-in aesthetic appreciation for animals turns into sexual desire for animals, then logic dictates it would be the same in regards to human, animus or no. Which is to say, there is a cut-off point where the ability to appreciate aesthetics becomes actual sexuality.

Which again translates to, "The ability to dress yourself does not necessarily mean part of you wants to sit on the D."

By the by, as Ilias reminded me earlier, becoming an Alp is not entirely like homosexuality. Becoming an alp is, in actuality, an active choice. Not a ~conscious~ choice, mind, but a choice all the same. It actually ~does~ have to be something the person wants.