Board Thread:What Would You Do?/@comment-27346571-20170728215310/@comment-29661846-20170729121358

I'm honored to be placed among the top writers of this site. It means alot, really :). Before I post my response (or even begin to write it) though, I wish to through express my two cents on this matter, as I feel partially responsible for this.

MockingJester put it best saying limiters can fuel creativity but also be seen as unfairly limiting, and I agree. My own two cents is this: though limiters are appreciated, keep them to yourself. I know this hypocritical to what I said way back in the Decoy City WWYD, but I will get to that in a moment.

I know where you are coming from, writing WWYD scenariors takes time and creativity on par with writing responces, and it always feels like a sort of cop-out if when someone Deus Ex Machina/Mary-Gary Stu's their way out of it, but that is how they choose to respond, and effort and creativity certainly exist within such repsonses too.

You have good intentions in stating limiters, but stating them can also be seen as calling someone out or limiting their creative process unfairly. You wanted to expand thier creative process and improve the overall quality of responses, but came out by some as unfair.

Again though, I feel responsible for this. In the Decoy City WWYD I supported limiters for the sake of flowing creative juices, but I can see on this board some people (understandably) dissaprove to blatantly stated limiters, and see that I was wrong in my original view point. I apologize for this and for the arguing and trouble I have inadvertantly caused.

What I believe now is this: Write your WWYD and have faith in your writers.

This is a wonderful WWYD, and as you can see, people have replied with varied responses, some more to your taste than others. Having unsatisfactory WWYD responses is simply par for the course, and I can undestand the sensation. That is my two cents, thank you for reading it all if you did, and I'm sorry if this fuels the flames so to speak.