Hello, I apologize for the late reply, but the bot service won't be required. I appreciate that you mentioned it though.
In regards to the image policies, is it alright if we host the images on another platform, mostly due to the size the galleries reached in the meantime but also so we won't break any of Fandom's ToS accidentally?
Thanks for asking about this. We do examine requests like this on a case by case basis, there is not necessarily a blanket rule. And usually it's an assessment of the "level of explicitness" of the images that would be linked from Fandom pages.
In the past, we have judged the uncensored Monster Girl images to be too explicit to be linked from Fandom pages. So unless you have more information that might change this decision, the answer is no. If you would like to use Special:Contact to send some example links, we can assess those. Feel free to put my username in the message if you do that, so I can be sure to see it.
In that case, is it okay to make the same galleries as proposed before, but without any explicit content in them, since the sheer volume of artwork is still massive to begin with?
That should be fine, but by "as proposed before" do you mean on Fandom or hosted elsewhere? Sorry, just want to make sure I'm not lost on what previous part of a conversation you are referencing.
It's possible we can help with batch uploading to Fandom, even with SEO-optimized filenames, if you feel that the time issue is the main blocker.
http://imgbox.com/g/N8AoPhx333
By 'as proposed before' I mean hosting the images elsewhere. It's mostly just so I can moderate them better, and to have the freedom to organize them with ease in the future.
After the final count, the wiki's image folder came out at about 11000 files. Take out about 5000-ish for explicit images and stuff that's already on this wikia, and you've still got a rather massive amount. An amount I'd rather not have on here.
The time constraint is not an issue, well, rather, it won't be an issue after the 19th of November, as I'll be able to finish the moving process until that date.
I'd like to express my thanks for your consideration, and for your clarification regarding the gallery issues, but Fandom's help won't be necessary this time. If something unexpected comes up, however, I'll be sure to contact Support.
Regarding the link you posted -- the two images in that gallery are obviously fine. And if there won't be any explicit images in the galleries then it's fine to link to an offsite gallery in general.
However, I got served with full-on porn ads from that host as I browsed the two-image gallery. So using that host will absolutely not be okay. If that was your plan then please find another hosting solution for the images.
http://imgbox.com/g/aA1JOuTawA
I have played with the host's settings and set everything as family-friendly, the original adult rating of the gallery was probably the cause of those full-on porn ads.
Since I didn't seem to get any ads while browsing galleries.(I even made another account, added a bunch of galleries with the safe and adult rating, and then logged back into my original account, and still saws no ads). Would you kindly tell me if the advertisements from the link I shared still contains pornographic ads?
Hey, fellow idiots. I got it right here (its an archive so it might be buggy and not have all the content on it)
You guys might have an shot at archiving this stuff on Miraheze, since they have an wiki that's filled with explicit Star Wars fan art.