Ok. Lots of points taken. I did misunderstand genli, I can see now why you might not like the origin of the wonderland mamono. I get that people might just not like things about the setting.
The queen is not a dictator. Come on now. (By which I mean the one from mge that we've been talking about).
But I'd like to launch my final point that I've been hoping to get into, and I'm glad to see that it seems to be more than just one person (I think?) who doesn't like the queen of hearts from the original story. Now I'm moving to talk about the queen of hearts from the original story.
Now I have not read much of the source material, as I mentioned much earlier. I never read the original book, I saw the tim burton movie, and I am relatively familiar with the disney adaptation. I may have even see it when I was younger. I looked through the disney wiki entry on the character, as she appears in the movie and it confirmed what I thought I knew. So yes the queen is a horrible tyrant and completely unreasonable. But lets all put on our thinking caps for a moment, this was a story which Lewis Carroll wrote for children, like most of his work, I imagine. People rarely write things just for the heck of it, especially for kids. So what is alice in wonderland about?
I struggled with this for a long time, when I was given to think about the story, it seemed that it ought to have something going on beyond just the text itself. And from some other peoples' observations, which I can't link to or single out specifically, I heard a really good analysis. Alice in wonderland is from a child's perspective, about the ways in which children view the world of adults. Alice starts by following the white rabbit, who is always needlessly busy and stressed and won't even talk about what for, because adults are always running about for things. (I've also read an anecdote about how a lot of the characters are literal parodies of people or ideas that were well known at the time, Carroll making fun of a lot of things in contemporary culture. I have no doubt this could be true, I wonder if that's the intention behind the mad hatter, or the tea party scene, or the caterpillar. But I couldn't corroborate these ideas myself). Jumping back to the idea of confusing adult life, I might hazard a guess that the caterpillar's sort of empty sounding words are about how adults always seem to give vague and unhelpful advice to kids. The tea party scene could really just be "adults overwhelm kids with lots of information and facts and things they need to remember but may not even make sense altogether).
But this interpretation, which I would go so far as to suppose is intended, really makes sense to me in light of the queen. Adults get get unreasonably mad all the time, losing their head or their temper, yelling at kids, at each other. But just as often they will let themselves be pushed around by other loud and angry adults. The card guards are all like employees trying to manage under their tyrannical boss, who holds them to impossible standards and punishes them for failing to meet them. The king of hearts is tiny and timid and unwilling to say anything to anger her. The queen arbitrarily takes a liking to alice, and they play a game. Where the queen cheats. Then alice tells her she's full of baloney and the queen gets mad, because adults don't like being told they're wrong, especially not by kids. And it's all just too silly for alice to deal with or accept, because adult life is silly and frightening. and then she gets chased off and wakes up from her dream. You can just hear Carroll telling all the kids who he wrote the book for, "this is how adult life is like, don't let yourself grow up to be like the queen, take a note from alice and stand up for yourself against unreasonable people".
Mango did mention how the mge wonderland setting was adapted, and I can see the resemblance. Instead of being a scary adult world that barely tolerates the presence of kids, it's a fun nonsensical world where your adult concerns don't matter and you can just do the sex. It's even further removed from the lives of other mamono who may often work or find other pastimes in their lives, or experience struggles from outside forces. Wonderland is for you to throw your problems away. KC also noted the strong association between wonderland and childhood, whether or not he understood the actual story. So we see some loli mamono, which I'm not fond of, but that feels almost beside the point.
This is why I can't take seriously the idea of the queen in the original book being unlikable. Of course she's unlikable, she's a villain in a children's story meant to teach kids a lesson. It's a metaphor. I also feel like a lot of this loses its context in translation to mge, which is why I just don't see why it's a big deal that the queen acts similarly selfish. The original queen was a frightening tyrant whom you're just trying to avoid at all costs. The mge queen of hearts is like a 12 year old child having petty tantrums about her dress or cookies. "You, you didn't give me the right cookies, you get the dicksucker 9000". Or the servant is married, so "you screwed up, now go make out with your wife". They are not the same thing.
If KC also chose to give her the king of hearts, a husband who is small and powerless and afraid to speak to her, I might feel personally that it was too far. That could echo of someone being unhappy. But no, she has no mention of a husband, and if there was one, he'd be like the happiest man in wonderland, married to the literal queen who is also a lilim.